Skip to main content
RAYTRON Logo

Decision Tool

Sample Validation Guide for Bimetallic Conductors

Step-by-step sample validation plan from first article to pilot lot, including test items, acceptance criteria and common failure modes.

Audience
Quality engineers, NPI engineers, process engineers
Purpose
Provide a repeatable 4-stage validation flow so sample approval takes 2–4 weeks instead of 6–8.

Stage 1 — Incoming inspection (Day 1–2)

Verify the sample matches the RFQ spec before any further testing. Reject early if geometry or bond type is wrong.

  • Dimension check Width, thickness, diameter, camber — 10 samples, Cpk ≥1.33
  • Bond type verification Cross-section microscope — confirm metallurgical cladding, not electroplating
  • Visual and surface No scratches, oxide stains, coating skips >5% of surface
  • Spool and packaging Match automation equipment; no deformation, no splice in 200 m

Stage 2 — Material and electrical (Day 3–7)

Confirm the conductor meets electrical and mechanical targets in the as-delivered state, before process integration.

  • Conductivity % IACS via resistance bridge, 3 samples, ±2% of spec
  • Tensile and elongation ASTM B566 for CCA; record yield and break strength
  • Bond strength Peel test or shear test — ≥60 MPa for CCA, ≥80 MPa for NCC
  • Coating thickness XRF, 5 points per sample, within ±10% of spec

Stage 3 — Process integration (Day 8–18)

Run the sample through the actual production process: stamping, welding, soldering, bending. Capture process parameters and yield.

  • Solderability (PV / harness) Wetting balance test, zero-cross time <2 s
  • Stamping and forming (terminals) No cracking at bend radius; burr <10% of thickness
  • Welding (busbar / battery) Pull strength ≥spec; no voids in cross-section
  • Process yield Run 500 pieces, yield ≥98% before pilot approval

Stage 4 — Reliability (Day 19–30)

Run accelerated life tests that match the end application. Failures here disqualify the sample from PPAP.

  • Thermal cycling PV: TC200; EV: TC1000 per USCAR-38
  • Damp heat PV: DH1000; general: 85°C/85%RH 500 h
  • Vibration (EV / aerospace) Random vibration per ISO 16750 or application spec
  • Post-test inspection No delamination, no resistance increase >5%, no visible cracks

Common failure modes and what they mean

If a sample fails, use this table to identify the root cause category before contacting the supplier.

FailureLikely root causeAction
Peel strength lowInsufficient cladding ratio or weak bondRequest cross-section + bond strength report
Resistance highCladding ratio below spec or temper wrongRe-check % IACS and alloy cert
Cracking at bendTemper too hard or cladding too thinRequest softer temper or thicker cladding
Solderability failCoating oxidized or wrong alloyRequest coating thickness + wetting test
Delamination after TCBond not metallurgical (electroplated)Reject supplier — bond type mismatch

Last updated: 2026-06 | This document is a general reference; final specifications are subject to mutually confirmed RFQ documentation.

Contact Raytron Now - Let Every Meter of Material Create Higher Value for You

Raytron focuses on copper-aluminum composite PV ribbon and busbar ribbon, plus CCA, CCS and NCC clad conductors with custom specifications, sample support and production quotations.

13
Precision Rolling Lines

Rolling, slitting and dimensional control

15,000
Tons Annual Capacity

Supports samples, pilot lots and ongoing supply

28
Patents

Clad conductor, rolling and related processes

200 kg
MOQ

Suitable for engineering samples and trial orders

24h
RFQ Reply Within

Our team will respond to your inquiry within 24 hours.

ISO9001
Certified

Quality system and lot traceability support

RFQ Request Quote Response within 24h WhatsApp
Request Quote WhatsApp